You have to love Preacher Manning.  You don't have to love what he says or how he says it, but you have to love his hutzpah for why he said it.  Not for the primary reason of trying to convince Negroid voters to support Clinton, but for the secondary, and actually more important reason, that being that Barack Hussein "Call me 'Barry'" Obama is not the new Negroid champion of all things.  As Preacher Manning says in response to allegations that he is trashing Obama, Obama was "born trash" as the result of "his in-heat African father going a-whoring  with a trashy white woman!"  Dismissing subjectiveness, the only inaccuracy in that statement is the word "woman". 
        Obama's dad was an African, ergo, a Negroid.  That's a given, as are the facts that he was, at the time of Obama's conception and birth, a young, healthy male of the human race.  What's not necessarily a given, but a truism, that as such a being, he was "in heat", perpetually and pointedly, as ALL such beings are, regardless of racial status of Negroid, Caucasoid, Mongoloid, et al.
         To escape the specificity of  race relative to the Obamas, let's talk race generalities, like terminologies.  Many might object to and/or be offended by terminologies used herein referring to race. These are the accepted, tradition scientific, anthropological terms, if not the overly popularized, politically correct terms that moreso identify geography or sociality rather than anthropology. As for assigning colors to identify the different races, that's fine, as long as we're not color blind in making those assignments.  Among the millions of humans I've seen in a half century of life, I have never seen a black or white person.  I've seen some who were VERY dark brown, and I've seen some albinos who were almost bleached white.  But in the final analysis, they all were some shade of pink or brown.  And do we even need to discuss the absurdity of red and/or yellow?  Though skin color is not the primary or even secondary scientific means of determining race, it is perhaps the easiest, most overt means for most of us anthropologically ignorant.  In reality, there are officially classified Caucasoids as dark and darker than any officially classified Negroid.  As socialization plays as much as or more than a role in racial identification as or than scientific assignment, we may propose that the original three races of man needs a contemporization.  Using external organ pigmentations of skin, hair, and eyes along with socialization as primary determinants, rather than skull construction and other skeletal-muscular characteristics, we have the original humans, the Negroids of Africa, developed through evolutionary or morphological means.  Through probably morphological means, the Caucasoids came to be, followed by those who could be called Semitic Mullatoids, who could now, in very contemporary terms be split into Jewish and Arabic Semitic Mullatoids.  Sometime during that period of unrecorded history, which goes way beyond six thousand years, for you fundamentalists, came the Mongoloids. From them, with perhaps a mixing in of others and other external influences of mass mileage migrations, there are what we might label as Occidental Mongoloids; those "native" peoples inhabiting the western hemisphere when the Caucasoids 'discovered' the North and South American continents.  By that 'discovery', particularly that to the south of what is now the United States, we developed a new race that can be accurately named Hispanic Mullatoid.  By socialization of nationalistic and religious characteristics, there is that huge and still growing group of very dark brown Caucasoids who are definitely not Negroids who might be best called Hindi, whose close cousins  might be the Australoids.
        Throughout the human race, it is human nature to base most ideas and actions on emotionality, rather than on intellectuality.  And negative emotionality, particularly fear is the primary driving force in most anything and everything that humans do.  It is especially the fear of the different and/or unknown that is most frightening.  It is therefore, at the heart and soul of humanity to be, if not racist, bigoted and/or prejudicial.  Until we, as the human race, evolve intellectually, so as to subdue our dominant emotionality, there is going to be prejudice, bigotry, and racism.  Even in the United States, the most racially and culturally diverse place on the Earth in the history of Earth, there is not a Caucasoid alive who hasn't thought or said at some point "Damned Negroid(s)!" as there's not a Negroid alive who hasn't said or thought "Damned Caucasoid(s)!"  Of course, I've used nouns here that are not from the actual exclamations.  Though it's probably publishable, with no problem to label Caucasoids as Honky, Cracker, White Devil, or whatever, don't for goodness sake refer to "The N word",  or the Ch word for Asians or Oriental Mongoloids, or Indian for the "Native Americans" or Occidental Mongoloids or the Sp word for the Hispanic Mullatoids.  And those exclamations have been thought and declared by members of every racial sect about members of every other racial sect.  It is instinctively human to distrust that or whom which or who is different.
        And though there are distinct, objectively decipherable differences between the races, that is not to declare that any are any better than any other.  Despite, perhaps because of our differences, we are designed so, so as to complement each other.  And perhaps our differences are amplified, not based on racial identification, but through cultural assimilations.  Members of  racial groups tend to strengthen that racial bond through cultural ties and traditions.  Throughout history, Caucasoid cultures have been based on the expansion of an individualistic independence, whereas Negroid, Mongoloid, and other cultures are rooted in a compliance to a common collectivism.          Perhaps that's why the African war lord told the captured American pilot in Mogadishu, "We Africans have been killing one another for thousands of years, and there's nothing you white people are going to do about it."  Maybe that's why an American Negroid who attempts to obtain an education or pursue professional goals is branded by other American Negroids with much worse racial epithets than ever uttered by any Caucasoid.  As "Hillary was never called a N(-word)", to quote Obama's pastor, Obama was surely berated as "Uncle...", "uppity...", and "acting white."    For those dark brown historical throwbacks, it is more important to maintain ancient tribal turbulences and instinctual ignorances like over-procreation, criminality, and remedially redundant recreations now exercised and exhorted as irreverant, irresponsible reproduction, gansta'ism, and rap than it is to actualize oneself as an independent person who can transcend the inanity of racialism through embrace and endeavor of familial faithfulness, personal productivity, and creative vocations and avocations.               As a truly biracial person, Obama has perhaps transcended racialism as what we could call a Globalistic Mullatoid, perhaps like Tiger Woods and Vijay Singh.  It is not the paternal, dominant  genetics that determined Obama's darkness of skin, hair, and eyes that is an issue. Nor is it the maternal, recessive genetics that determined that those pigmentations are such that  Obama is "..not (Negroid) enough" for some Negroids  that is the issue. It is the paternal, maternal, and step-paternal contributions to his raciality through socialization that is the issue.  That transcends race into the categories of the other two "Real R's", about which I've written before and shall again next.
        To close, let's address everyone's modern day favorite mud sling of "racist/racism".  Racism is the belief that one race is genetically and/or inherently superior to another or other race or races.  Racial prejudice is believing or thinking something of another race or member of another race before one has the facts.  Racial bigotry is mistrust or dislike for another race based solely on that person's or group's race.  Very few people are actually racist.  Among those who are, they're not all Caucasoids.  The Hispanic Mullatoids have La Raza, the Arabic Semitic Mullatoids teach their young of the superiority of their religiously, if not racially, based culture.  The Negroids have Black Power and Black Liberation Theology, and Nation of Islam.  The inscrutable, Oriental Mongoloids have something, don't you think?  And, of course, all Caucasoids belong to the Klan.    Though almost nobody in America is truly, strictly racist, it is still an easy catch phrase with which to lambaste people, as our wonderful governmental education system has failed to teach vocabulary for years, if not decades.  On the other hand, everybody is innately and/or influentially prejudiced and/or bigoted.  Whether it comes from personally observed, anectdotal evidence or individual, ignorantly stupid stereotyping, or from studying empirical statistical data, we all have racial prejudices and bigotries.
        Before any of you jump me for not supporting Obama "because he's black", let me assure you that I am whole heartedly against him, as I've always been against him because of the other two "Real R's" mentioned above.  Come November, I shall write in the name of Colin Powell for President.